Sunday, January 30, 2011

How to Value a Private Company - Merger and Acquisition Series



How to Value a Private Company
Merger & Acquisition Series


Valuing a private company is an important and often elusive process.  Because there is no exchange to determine market value, each transaction must be evaluated on its own merit.  Ultimately, the value is what a seller is willing to accept and a buyer is willing to pay.  No matter which side of the transaction you are own, however, it helps to take a methodically approach.  At Geo Strategy Partners we use the following five methods:

1.       Discounted Cash Flow Method (DCF) or the Present Value of Future Earnings.
2.       Market Value or the price paid for transactions involving similar companies.
3.       Book Value or the Net of Assets and Liabilities (typically plant and equipment items are adjusted from depreciated to replacement value).
4.       Strategic Value or the specific value to a buyers’ overall business. This method requires a bit of research and analysis and must be custom developed for each potential buyer and seller in a potential transaction.
5.       Competitive Process. This method applies to the sell side and usually requires an M&A intermediary (investment banker, broker, or business consultant) to create a competitive bidding process among a number of suitors.

In this posting, I will address the most common - and probably the most reliable – Discounted Cash Flow.

·         DCF (Discounted Cash Flow)= the present value of future earnings.


o    I believe this is the most accurate; but how good it is depends on the accuracy of the  assumptions underlying the forecast
o   The most important assumptions support the projection of an income statement; typically for five years into the future.
o   Revenue, COGS (Cost of Goods Sold), G&A (General & Administrative or Overhead), and EBITDA (Earnings Before Interests, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) must all be projected.  Other methods are based on free cash flow which is a little more complicated since you must take into consideration taxes and similar cash expenses.
o   Projecting the trend line of historic income statements is the place to start if you have a three to five year history of relatively stable performance.  The assumption is simply that business will continue to grow in the future at the same CAGR as the past.
o   The next component to factor in is the firm (booked) backlog of business.  Revenue under contract obviously substantiates a projected trend line and, if robust, can justify increasing the steepness of the top line revenue curve.
o   The sales pipeline should be considered next.  This is best projected utilizing a weighted average of outstanding proposals, business development underway, prospects, and leads.  Each component should be weighted based on the likelihood of it being becoming real business.  For example outstanding proposals might have a 50% likelihood of becoming booked business and would be weighted as such; business development activities underway should represent a fairly large amount of potential revenue but perhaps experience shows that about 25% will become real business.  In this case the total potential business you are actively pursuing would be given a weight of 25% of the total value.  Prospects and leads might be weighted as low as 5 or 10%.
o   As always, the more the assumptions underlying these projections are documented and supported, the more reliable they are assumed to be.
o   New business opportunities can also be included.  These could represent new markets to be pursued or new products planned for introduction.  If there is work underway to realize these opportunities or solid research to support how they might come about, it is perfectly legitimate to factor them in under a weighted formula.
o   COGS and other expenses must be factored based on what will be required to realize the projected revenue.  If additional capital expenditures are required, this factor will have to be accounted for in the overall evaluation but should not be included in the forecast itself except as a footnote.
o   Next, you need to adjust this pro forma income statement for factors that will change after a transaction.  This is known as recasting earnings.
o   For example, if the owner of a company is the CEO and will not stay on after the acquisition, his salary, benefits, and related costs can be added back in.  An accounting system or even an entire accounting department can sometimes be eliminated because it becomes redundant.  These costs can also be added back.  On the other side of the ledger, there are sometimes new expenses that must be incurred as a result of a merger or acquisition, and these should be subtracted from the forecast.
o   Once you have a well-documented and recast pro forma income statement, you have the basis for a DCF analysis.
o   EBITDA or net profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, or amortization then becomes the basis for the DCF analysis.
o   The five year earnings should be discounted back to their present value using the basic formula for present value which is as follows (Excel has a function that will do this for you):

o   In this formula, CF is EBITDA, the numeral is the year (i.e. year one projection; year two projection, etc.); R represents the discount rate.
o   Determining the discount rate, is a critical, and often disputed, key variable in a DCF valuation.  It represents the time value of money and is usually derived by first determining a risk free rate of return that could easily be earned on a cash investment. A common place to start is with a LIBOR rate or a 5 or 10 year U.S. Treasury Bond.  The expected return on any instrument that is considered virtually risk free, can be utilized but should be referenced in the analysis.  Next, we must adjust for inflation.  A reliable economic forecast should be referenced in determining a projected average annual inflation rate for the period of the forecast.
o   Next, we get to the most subjective component of the discount rate – the “Risk Premium.”  Because investing in a private company is inherently more risky that the “risk free” investment alternatives, we must factor in a premium to discount the value of future earnings to the present day.  Philosophically, it is similar to the weighted average that we apply to backlogs and sales pipeline.  But it is actually more of a factor that considers the likelihood that the company will not be able to achieve the expected performance or meet the numbers projected in the pro forma.  One risk factor is changing economic and market conditions.  Others relate to the company itself and how stable it is perceived to be.  It is the most subjective component of the discount rate and subject to dispute between buyer and seller.
o   An example of how a discount rate might be derived is as follows:



                *company stability, exchange rate risk, industry and market risk, economic uncertainty, risk that intellectual property can become obsolete, stability of companies customers, threat of competition, etc.

o   Once this formula is computed we have the Present Value of Future Earnings or a value for the company.  But we are not done.
o   Assuming our projection is for a five year period, what about year six and beyond?  We also need to consider the value of the earnings that continue to accrue to the buyer beyond the forecast period.  We account for this by determining a “Residual Value.”
o   A residual value or “salvage value” represents the what the company is projected to be worth in year six, considering all the earnings that are expected in year six and every year after that for perpetuity.  Obviously, the further out the earnings are received, the less their present value until at some point they become negligible.  There is actually a mathematical formula for this, but we must also consider that no business can be expected to continue forever in its present configuration.  So, how to we determine the value of the company in year six?
o   Here we have some risk of circular logic and sometimes the perception that we are counting the value of a company twice; however, we need to account for the value of earnings beyond the projected period.  There are two simple ways to do this:  Projected Book Value (explained in a later blog) or projected market value (also explained in a later blog).  A short cut to market value is often a multiple of forecast earnings in the last year of the projection.  A conservative multiple that is often used is 5 times EBITDA.  Since we are talking about earnings that might occur 5 years in the future, we should be conservative.  So if our forecast projects EBITDA in year Five to be $1,000,000, the Residual Value in year six is $5,000,000 or 5 x EBITDA.  This calculation is sometimes referred to as a “Hypothetical Sale.”
o   But this Hypothetical Sale value in year six must also be brought back to present value using the same discount rate.
o   Now we add the present value of earnings for the forecast period plus the present value of residual value and we have a value for the company using the Discounted Cash Flow method.
o   But we may still need to adjust for other factors such as excess inventory, or fixed assets that might have a useful life beyond the forecast period.  However, by including a residual value in our calculations, we have usually accounted for these factors since we are projecting numbers so far into the future, it is unlikely that the effect of such items will still be relevant.

The Discounted Cash Flow method is considered reliable because the true value of a business is the profits it can make for the shareholders.  The formula itself is solid math.  The devil, however, lies in the details of the assumptions. 

Mark Towery
Managing Director

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Industrial Maintenance Activity Picking UP

According to a recent report by Industrial Info, US manufacturers are returning to pre-recession levels of maintenance and repair activities.  This is good news for many industrial suppliers.

http://www.industrialinfo.com/showAbstract.jsp?newsitemID=172248


www.geostrategypartners.com

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Is Your Market Insights Partner Geared for B2B/Industrial?


We had a rare weather event in Atlanta last week.  Six inches of snow followed by freezing rain that left another inch veneer of ice.  Schools were closed all week.  People were stranded in cars on the interstate; sliding into light poles… and each other.  I simply got in my Land Rover, put in 4WD Hi Lock and drove to work and all over town.  I was able to do this because my vehicle is designed and geared for all terrain navigation.
My wife drives a sleek, black sedan.  Its rear wheel drive handles great on dry pavement, and you only have to think about accelerating and before you know it a friendly officer has his boot on your bumper and is writing down your license plate.  My wife’s car couldn’t get out of our icy driveway for three days. It’s designed and geared for a smooth ride and rapid acceleration.  I’ll never win a drag race with my Land Rover, but it’s great for pulling a boat or getting you to a duck blind.
What does this little analogy have to do with Market Research and Strategy?  We’ve recently been interviewing to add depth to our market research staff.  The market research professionals we have interviewed have been very qualified, but their experience is mostly limited to consumer markets.  They are used to running multiple surveys on thousands of respondents and crunching the data with routine analytical techniques.  When we demonstrate the depth and breadth of research and analysis we perform on b2b/industrial markets, and the time we take to understand technical applications of industrial products and services, they are overwhelmed. 
The reality is that over 90% of market research firms do over 90% of their work in consumer markets.  That’s what they are geared for.  Frankly, they would run circles around us conducting cola taste tests or determining what kind of toothpaste dispenser consumers might prefer.  We have the capabilities to do most consumer research, but we are not geared for it and would likely not be very efficient or economical at doing it.  At the same time, most of these firms do not have consultants on staff with industrial manufacturing backgrounds or strategy formulation experience.  They simply run in a different gear.
B2B/Industrial market analysis is different in many ways from consumer and I have talked about some of these distinctions previously in this blog.  But one important characteristic is the need to have experienced personnel that know how to access difficult to reach decision makers like a material engineer with influence over choosing a specific type of composite material buried deep inside a Fortune 500 manufacturer; or to determine the myriad of decision-makers over effluent water treatment; or to be able to determine the best market positioning for a particular type of pressure vessel manufacturer.  B2B/Industrial consultants need to be able to combine research, analysis, and strategy formulation.  They don’t often know much about toothpaste, but they know the difference between a butterfly valve and a gate valve. They can run multi-variant analysis as well as a consumer research professional, but they also know how to convert insights into strategy.
My wife used to think my Land Rover was ugly.  She often complained when she had to step up two feet into the cab while wearing a dress.  But she didn’t complain last week when I drove her to work.  Industrial firms know that matching the right material, product, equipment or solution to the right application is the key to sales and marketing success.  When choosing a market research and strategy partner, the same philosophy should apply.  You wouldn’t use a bushing when a spherical roller bearing is called for.  Don’t select a consumer firm to analyze industrial markets unless you are concerned about how white your teeth are.

Mark Towery
Managing Director

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Everything you already knew about strategy but were afraid to implement


Simplifying Strategy.
The airport bookstore is filled with books telling you how to achieve success in business.  The one conclusion they all seem to support is that writing a book on business success is one way to do it.  It seems if you find a different way to look at some aspect of strategy, give it a clever name, and have a well-designed book cover, you will have an instant following.  Everyone, it seems, is looking for the next big thing to achieve a competitive advantage. The reality is, in my opinion, it is a lot easier to write about strategy than to formulate and implement it.

Sometimes I think some of the travelers pulling out their credit cards in the airport bookstore would be better off giving their money to a television preacher with big hair.  Or that Guthy Renker ape of a guy with big teeth.  Not that most of these books don’t impart a piece of wisdom or offer an effective tool or two.  But for my money, no one has published a  meaningful contribution to strategic thinking since Michael Porter. The reality is that there is no magic elixir.  Strategy doesn’t have to be complicated, but formulating and sticking to a strategy can be hard work. 

In simple terms, strategy should be about focusing all resources and aligning all activities to achieve a competitive advantage.  Unfortunately, firms typically make the following mistakes:

  • ·         They confuse operational efficiency and performance improvement with strategy;
  • ·         They confuse data analysis and planning with strategy formulation;
  • ·         They emulate their competitors instead of trying to outwit them in the marketplace (i.e. benchmarking);
  • ·         They follow initial success with exuberant expansion – usually including acquisitions – and in doing so, sometimes diffuse and weaken the core strategy;
  • ·         They mistake capabilities for core competencies;
  • ·         They either leave strategic planning in the board room or they ignore it and focus on implementation; few companies can marry strategy formulation and competitive experience correctly.

So what’s the magic elixir?
Strategy formulation is a unique undertaking for every company and every situation. But in the end, it should meet the following tests:

  1. ·         It should result in a way of going to market that is distinctly different from competitors;
  2. ·         It should be centered around a core value proposition that permeates every product  and service offering;
  3. ·         All resources and activities of the organization should be employed with the purpose of reinforcing the strategy and thereby enhancing the competitive advantage;
  4. ·         It should be grounded in market and competitive analysis that ensures a sustainable demand for the core offering;
  5. ·          It should be reflected in a business model that links the value created by the core strategy to the value captured in the market place;
  6. ·        It should be a  flexible, living instrument, refined continuously based market experience; but have a constant core that serves as the center of gravity;
  7. ·         It should set the boundaries for what you do and DON”T DO and be followed with discipline.

Hey that’s seven.  Maybe there’s a book title in there somewhere. How about “the seven things you already knew about strategy but didn’t have the conviction to follow?”


Mark Towery
Managing Director
Geo Strategy Partners
The Leading Business-to-Business/Industrial Market Research and Strategy Firm

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Future Power

It is often said that the stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones.

Take a look at these near term energy solutions.

http://content.kiplinger.com/tools/slideshows/slideshow_pop.html?nm=innovations


Mark Towery
Geo Strategy Partners
The leading industrial market research and strategy firm